Editorial Policy

We aim to make recommendations understandable and claims traceable.

Sources and verification

For changing product details, we prefer official pricing, help, product, privacy, and license pages. Tool profiles identify the documentation used and the date checked. A verification date covers the stated information; it does not mean every feature has been tested or that a future account will receive the same limits.

Testing and examples

Current profiles are documentation-based. Example prompts and proposed comparisons are workflows readers can try; they are not reported test results. If hands-on results are added, the task, plan, date, relevant inputs, observations, and limitations should be described. We do not invent ratings, screenshots, user counts, author identities, or credentials.

How comparisons work

We explain decision factors and encourage the same task, inputs, and success criteria for each tool. A suitable choice depends on the reader’s account, available features, review effort, and intended use. A longer feature list is not automatically a better result.

AI assistance and editorial responsibility

AI may help draft, organize, or edit material. Publishing remains an editorial decision. Factual claims need checking, and an AI-generated citation is not accepted as evidence without examining the source.

Corrections and updates

When reporting an issue, include the page URL, the claim, the provider source, and the date observed. See our Contact page for the public phone contact. Update dates should reflect a substantive edit or recheck, rather than a cosmetic change.

Commercial relationships

Paid placements and affiliate links, if introduced, must be identified. We do not sell guaranteed positive conclusions. Read the Advertising & Affiliate Disclosure.